Bioactive Glasses and Glass-Ceramics for Healthcare Applications in Bone Regeneration and Tissue Engineering
authors Fernandes, HR; Gaddam, A; Rebelo, A; Brazete, D; Stan, GE; Ferreira, JMF
nationality International
journal MATERIALS
author keywords bioactive glasses; alkali-free; scaffolds fabrication; additive manufacturing techniques; bone regeneration; tissue engineering
keywords MAGNETRON-SPUTTERED BIOGLASS; IN-VITRO BIOACTIVITY; PULSED-LASER DEPOSITION; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; THIN-FILMS; ELECTROPHORETIC DEPOSITION; DRUG-DELIVERY; BIODEGRADATION BEHAVIOR; CAO-MGO-SIO2 SYSTEM; STRUCTURAL-CHARACTERIZATION
abstract The discovery of bioactive glasses (BGs) in the late 1960s by Larry Hench et al. was driven by the need for implant materials with an ability to bond to living tissues, which were intended to replace inert metal and plastic implants that were not well tolerated by the body. Among a number of tested compositions, the one that later became designated by the well-known trademark of 45S5 Bioglass (R) excelled in its ability to bond to bone and soft tissues. Bonding to living tissues was mediated through the formation of an interfacial bone-like hydroxyapatite layer when the bioglass was put in contact with biological fluids in vivo. This feature represented a remarkable milestone, and has inspired many other investigations aiming at further exploring the in vitro and in vivo performances of this and other related BG compositions. This paradigmatic example of a target-oriented research is certainly one of the most valuable contributions that one can learn from Larry Hench. Such a goal-oriented approach needs to be continuously stimulated, aiming at finding out better performing materials to overcome the limitations of the existing ones, including the 45S5 Bioglass (R). Its well-known that its main limitations include: (i) the high pH environment that is created by its high sodium content could turn it cytotoxic; (ii) and the poor sintering ability makes the fabrication of porous three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds difficult. All of these relevant features strongly depend on a number of interrelated factors that need to be well compromised. The selected chemical composition strongly determines the glass structure, the biocompatibility, the degradation rate, and the ease of processing (scaffolds fabrication and sintering). This manuscript presents a first general appraisal of the scientific output in the interrelated areas of bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics, scaffolds, implant coatings, and tissue engineering. Then, it gives an overview of the critical issues that need to be considered when developing bioactive glasses for healthcare applications. The aim is to provide knowledge-based tools towards guiding young researchers in the design of new bioactive glass compositions, taking into account the desired functional properties.
publisher MDPI
issn 1996-1944
year published 2018
volume 11
issue 12
digital object identifier (doi) 10.3390/ma11122530
web of science category Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
subject category Materials Science
unique article identifier WOS:000456419200188
  ciceco authors
  impact metrics
journal analysis (jcr 2017):
journal impact factor 2.467
5 year journal impact factor 3.325
category normalized journal impact factor percentile 61.228
dimensions (citation analysis):
altmetrics (social interaction):



 


Sponsors

1suponsers_list_ciceco.jpg