Impedance Analysis and Conduction Mechanisms of Lead Free Potassium Sodium Niobate (KNN) Single Crystals and Polycrystals: A Comparison Study
authors Rafiq, MA; Costa, ME; Tkach, A; Vilarinho, PM
nationality International
abstract Impedance spectroscopy (IS) is used to compare defects and charge transport in (001) oriented K0.5Na0.5NbO3 (KNN) single crystals and its polycrystalline counterpart. KNN single crystals show lower conductivity than polycrystalline counterpart from room temperature up to 200 degrees C, but above this temperature polycrystalline KNN displays lower conductivity. The low temperature (T < 200 degrees C) behavior reflects the different processing conditions of ceramics and single crystals, which account for less defects prone to charge transport in the case of single crystals. As temperature increases (T > 200 degrees C) single crystals become more conductive than polycrystalline samples in which grain boundaries act as barriers to charge transport. For even higher temperatures, the conductivity difference between both is increased because of the contribution of ionic conduction in single crystals. Indeed the values of activation energy calculated to the high temperature range (T > 300 degrees C) were 1.60 and 0. 97 eV, confirming the charge transport because of ionic conduction and ionized oxygen vacancies in single crystals and polycrystalline KNN, respectively. It is suggested that single crystals with low defects content and improved electromechanical properties could be a better choice for room temperature applications, though at high temperatures less conductive ceramics may be the choice, depending on the targeted use.
issn 1528-7483
year published 2015
volume 15
issue 3
beginning page 1289
ending page 1294
digital object identifier (doi) 10.1021/cg5016884
web of science category Chemistry, Multidisciplinary; Crystallography; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
subject category Chemistry; Crystallography; Materials Science
unique article identifier WOS:000350614400036
  ciceco authors
  impact metrics
journal impact factor (jcr 2016): 4.055
5 year journal impact factor (jcr 2016): 4.054
category normalized journal impact factor percentile (jcr 2016): 81.179
dimensions (citation analysis):
altmetrics (social interaction):