Evaluation of thin mercury film rotating disk electrode to perform absence of gradients and Nernstian equilibrium stripping (AGNES) measurements
authors Rocha, LS; Companys, E; Galceran, J; Carapuca, HM; Pinheiro, JP
nationality International
journal TALANTA
author keywords Thin mercury film rotating disk electrode (TMF-RDE); Absence of gradients and Nernstian equilibrium stripping (AGNES); Heavy metals speciation
abstract In the present work, the applicability of thin mercury film on a rotating disk electrode (TMF-RDE), to assess the free metal ion concentration by the absence of gradients and Nernstian equilibrium stripping (AGNES). is evaluated. The thickness of the mercury film and several AGNES parameters has been optimized. A nominal 16 nm film is chosen due to the higher signal (faradaic current) relative to the value of the noise (capacitive current). Due to the smaller volume to area ratio, the deposition time needed to reach a certain preconcentration factor (Y) is much shorter than in larger electrodes, like the HMDE. The limit of detection (3 sigma) for lead(II) is 7.4 x 10(-9) M and 7.2 x 10(-8) M for a Y of 5000 (deposition time of 150 s) and 1000 (deposition time of 100 s), respectively. A specific mathematical treatment is developed in order to subtract a corrected blank taking into account the degradation of the thin film (presumably, falling down of drops). The couple TMF-RDE/AGNES is successfully applied for speciation purposes in the systems Pb(II)-latex nanospheres and Pb(II)-IDA (iminodiacetic acid), where the stability constants calculated for both systems agree with values reported in the literature. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
issn 0039-9140
year published 2010
volume 80
issue 5
beginning page 1881
ending page 1887
digital object identifier (doi) 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.10.038
web of science category Chemistry, Analytical
subject category Chemistry
unique article identifier WOS:000275612500046
  impact metrics
journal analysis (jcr 2019):
journal impact factor 5.339
5 year journal impact factor 4.711
category normalized journal impact factor percentile 87.791
dimensions (citation analysis):
altmetrics (social interaction):