Comparative study on hydrolysis and bioethanol production from cardoon and rockrose pretreated by dilute acid hydrolysis
authors Fernandes, MC; Ferro, MD; Paulino, AFC; Chaves, HT; Evtuguin, DV; Xavier, AMRB
nationality International
journal INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
author keywords Enzymatic hydrolysis; Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF); Separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF); Cynara cardunculus; Cistus ladcoufer
keywords CYNARA-CARDUNCULUS; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; STEAM-EXPLOSION; ENZYMATIC SACCHARIFICATION; CISTUS-LADANIFER; BIOMASS
abstract Bioethanol production potential from cardoon (Cynara cardunculus) and rockrose (Cistus ladanifer), pretreated by diluted acid hydrolysis (DAH), was studied and compared by both, separate enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) processes. DAH pretreatment allowed an increase of 5 fold to cardoon and 16 fold to rockrose in cellulose accessibility towards enzymatic hydrolysis. Both plants showed better overall fermentation efficiency and ethanol yield in SSF than in SHF also with shorter processing periods, 24 h against 72 + 24 h, respectively. Results obtained for rockrose are about half the concentration and volumetric productivity of ethanol and 60% of the overall fermentation efficiency of those obtained for cardoon. The recalcitrance of rockrose to enzymatic hydrolysis was explained by higher abundance of lignin and extractives than in cardoon. Comparing the steam explosion (SE) and DAH pretreatments, the former was more advantageous for the recalcitrant rockrose in terms of enzymatic saccharification yield.
publisher ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
issn 0926-6690
year published 2018
volume 111
beginning page 633
ending page 641
digital object identifier (doi) 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.11.037
web of science category Agricultural Engineering; Agronomy
subject category Agriculture
unique article identifier WOS:000419407600077
  ciceco authors
  impact metrics
journal impact factor (jcr 2016): 3.181
5 year journal impact factor (jcr 2016): 3.577
category normalized journal impact factor percentile (jcr 2016): 85.349
dimensions (citation analysis):
altmetrics (social interaction):



 


Sponsors

1suponsers_list_ciceco.jpg