abstract
The soluble amount of Si and Al in biomass fly ash (BFA) and metakaolin (MK) was determined by using a spectrophotometric (colorimetric) method. This low-cost technique is simple to operate, and shows high selectivity and suitable sensitivity. Molybdenum blue and eriochrome cyanine R (ECR) methods were used to quantify, respectively, the SiO2 and Al2O3 amounts leached out to a sodium hydroxide solution (10 mol dm(-3)). The obtained results were compared with the chemical composition of the precursors and their amorphous phase amounts. The soluble amount of SiO2 was 7.5 wt% for BFA, and 40.3 wt% for MK. Values equal to 6.3 wt% for BFA and 35.2 wt% for MK were estimated for Al2O3. These results are quite comparable with those obtained through the combination of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) using fully quantitative phase analysis (FQPA): soluble SiO2 equal to 4.4 wt% for BFA and 46.1 wt% for MK, and soluble Al2O3 equal to 10.0 wt% for BFA and 35.5 wt% for MK. Then, BFA- and MK-based geopolymers were formulated, taking into account the soluble Si and Al contents estimated by the colorimetric methods, testing three distinct (2.5, 3.3 and 4.5) SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratios (R-S/A) and curing times (15, 21 and 28 days). The BFA reaction degree (alpha) and the compressive strength of the obtained samples were determined to validate the reliability of the spectrophotometric estimations. A linear correlation between the two variables was observed in BFA-based geopolymers for curing times >= 21 days. At the same time, MK and BFA based samples formulated with a fixed R-S/A, adjusted by adding silica fume, show similar compressive strength values. The use of this spectrometric technique to evaluate the amount of reactive components (Si and Al) in the precursors is an interesting tool for the design of, and to predict the performance of, the cured material.
keywords
FLY-ASH; TRACE-ELEMENTS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD; ALKALI ACTIVATION; DISSOLUTION; MECHANISM; BEHAVIOR; COAL; METAKAOLIN; EVOLUTION
subject category
Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
authors
Buruberri, LH; Tobaldi, DM; Caetano, A; Seabra, MP; Labrincha, JA
our authors
acknowledgements
This work was developed within the scope of the project CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007679 (FCT Ref. UID/CTM/50011/2013), financed by national funds through the FCT/MEC and when appropriate co-financed by FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement. L.H. Buruberri acknowledge the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT - Portugal) for their support (SFRH/BD/111243/2015). We thank R. C. Pullar for assistance with the English editing.