abstract
In this reply, we address the concerns that were raised about our paper on CsPbBr3 single crystals. M. Szafranski criticized the dielectric and DSC data in our original paper claiming that they were affected by the experimental artefacts or poor quality of the investigated single crystals, as his DSC and dielectric data did not show any low temperature anomalies in CsPbBr3. We argue in this reply that our main conclusions were not made based on the DSC and dielectric experiments. Here, we emphasize the importance of other experiments like EPR and XRD that were performed to understand if there are any structural transformations of CsPbBr3 at low temperatures. We believe that M. Szafranski did not take into account all the discussion that was presented in our original paper. We hope to clear the doubts in this reply.
keywords
PEROVSKITE
subject category
Chemistry, Physical; Energy & Fuels; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
authors
Svirskas, S; Balciunas, S; Simenas, M; Usevicius, G; Kinka, M; Velicka, M; Kubicki, D; Castillo, ME; Karabanov, A; Shvartsman, VV; Soares, MD; Sablinskas, V; Salak, AN; Lupascu, DC; Banys, J
our authors
Andrei Salak
Principal ResearcherProjects
CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials (UIDB/50011/2020)
CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials (UIDP/50011/2020)
Collaboratory for Emerging Technologies, CoLab (EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES)
acknowledgements
This project has received funding from the Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT), agreement No. S-MIP-19-4. The research done in University of Aveiro was supported by the project CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials, UIDB/50011/2020 & UIDP/50011/2020, financed by national funds through the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology/MCTES. A. K. and D. C. L. acknowledge funding through the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Lu729/23 - 424708448) and through the European Union in the framework of the PeroBOOST project (EFRE-0800120; NW-1-1040h).