authors |
Sukul, M; Sahariah, P; Lauzon, HL; Borges, J; Masson, M; Mano, JF; Haugen, HJ; Reseland, JE |
nationality |
International |
journal |
CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS |
author keywords |
Chitosan; Degree of deacetylation; Molecular weight; Osteoblasts |
keywords |
IONIC-STRENGTH; SCAFFOLD; DIFFERENTIATION; ACETYLATION; ENDOTOXINS; HYDROGELS; DELIVERY; CHITIN; GROWTH; CELLS |
abstract |
We have studied the effect of chitosan sponges, produced from chitosan batches with distinct degree of deacetylation (DDA) and molecular weight (Mw), on the adhesion, growth and differentiation of primary human osteoblasts with an aim to offer a suitable tool for guided bone regeneration. All the chitosan sponges revealed similar microstructure, irrespective of the DDA (58, 73, 82, 88, and 91 %) and Mw (749, 547, 263, 215, and 170 kDa, respectively). Cell spreading was higher on sponges having a higher DDA. Higher DDA induced a more pronounced increase in alkaline phosphatase activity, osteopontin (OPN), vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and reduction in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), sclerostin (SOST) and dickkopf related protein-1 as compared to lower DDA. Lower DDA induced the increased secretion of osteoprotegerin and SOST as compared to higher DDA. The combination of higher DDA and Mw induced an increased secretion of VEGF and IL-6, however reduced the secretion of OPN as compared to chitosan with similar DDA but with lower Mw. In summary, the variations in cellular responses to the different chitosan sponges indicate a potential for individual tailoring of desired responses in guided bone regeneration. |
publisher |
ELSEVIER SCI LTD |
issn |
0144-8617 |
isbn |
1879-1344 |
year published |
2021 |
volume |
254 |
digital object identifier (doi) |
10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117434 |
web of science category |
11 |
subject category |
Chemistry, Applied; Chemistry, Organic; Polymer Science |
unique article identifier |
WOS:000604614900003
|
ciceco authors
impact metrics
journal analysis (jcr 2019):
|
journal impact factor |
7.182 |
5 year journal impact factor |
6.89 |
category normalized journal impact factor percentile |
96.638 |
dimensions (citation analysis):
|
|
altmetrics (social interaction):
|
|
|