Comparative studies of structure, spectroscopic properties and intensity parameters of tetragonal rare earth vanadate nanophosphors doped with Eu(III)
authors Tomasz Grzyb, Agata Szczeszak, Andrii Shyichuk, Renaldo Tenorio Moura Jr., Albano Neto Carneiro Neto, Nina Andrzejewska, Oscar Loureiro Malta, and Stefan Lis
nationality International
journal Journal of Alloys and Compounds
abstract Hydrothermal method was applied in order to synthesize nanocrystalline YVO4, LaVO4 and GdVO4 materials doped with Eu³⁺ ions. The conditions of synthesis were chosen to allow control of the process based on precipitation reaction in an autoclave, at elevated temperature and pressure. The prepared materials crystallized as single phase spherical-like nanocrystals of the tetragonal I41/amd structure. The average size of the particles was in the range of 7–10 nm in the YVO4- and GdVO4-based products and about 32 nm when LaVO4 was the host compound. The excitation spectra of the materials prepared revealed a broad and intense band in the UV region. The band resulted from charge transfer phenomena: excitation of the VO4³⁺ groups was followed by the energy transfer to Eu³⁺ ions. Intense, red emission of the samples was a result of electronic transitions in Eu³⁺ dopant ions. The theoretical Judd-Ofelt intensity parameters Ωλ, obtained using the novel approach to the calculation of Eu-O bond stretching force constant and subsequently charge factors, were compared to the experimental Ωλ. Forced electric dipole part of Ωλ was calculated from scratch (using Eu³⁺ coordination geometry in REVO4 from DFT calculations), while a single parameter in the dynamic coupling part was fitted to the experimental data. The issues related to the force constant calculation are discussed. Crucial influence of crystal lattice distortions on Ωλ and Eu³⁺ emission intensities of the materials was shown.
year published 2018
volume 741
beginning page 459
ending page 472
digital object identifier (doi) 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.095
  ciceco authors
  impact metrics
journal analysis (jcr 2019):
journal impact factor 4.65
5 year journal impact factor 4.082
category normalized journal impact factor percentile 77.703
dimensions (citation analysis):
altmetrics (social interaction):



 


Apoio

1suponsers_list_ciceco.jpg