A geometry-independent moment correction method for the MPMS3 SQUID-based magnetometer
authors Amorim, CO; Mohseni, F; Dumas, RK; Amaral, VS; Amaral, JS
nationality International
journal MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
author keywords magnetometry; SQUID; geometry effects; radial offset
abstract Modern superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometers enable fully automated measurements with currently unmatched sensitivity. The measured moment values are, however, prone to deviations from their actual value due to geometric effects, namely sample size, shape, and radial offset. The current procedure to correct these geometric effects, for the magnetic property measurement 3 (MPMS3) magnetometer, is based on an available simulation tool, valid for both SQUID-VSM and DC-scan methods. Still, determining the correction factor requires samples with well-defined geometric shapes together with accurate sample dimensions and the usually difficult to determine radial offset. There is no established solution to correct geometry effects of irregularly shaped samples or unknown radial offsets. In this work, we find a systematic relation between the difference of SQUID-VSM and DC-scan measurements and their corresponding correction factors for the MPMS3. This relation follows a clear trend, independent of sample geometry and radial offset, for a given pair of DC-scan length and SQUID-VSM amplitude values. Exploiting this trend, a geometry-independent correction method is presented and validated by measurements of two different geometries of the same Al piece, two different radial offsets of a Ni square, and metallic Fe powder using a far from optimal sample mounting.
publisher IOP PUBLISHING LTD
issn 0957-0233
isbn 1361-6501
year published 2021
volume 32
issue 10
digital object identifier (doi) 10.1088/1361-6501/ac0d23
web of science category 5
subject category Engineering, Multidisciplinary; Instruments & Instrumentation
unique article identifier WOS:000670044000001
  ciceco authors
  impact metrics
journal analysis (jcr 2019):
journal impact factor 1.857
5 year journal impact factor 1.862
category normalized journal impact factor percentile 52.039
dimensions (citation analysis):
altmetrics (social interaction):



 


Sponsors

1suponsers_list_ciceco.jpg